Impact of Social Policies on Multidimensional Poverty in Guayaquil

Empirical Evaluation of Public Programs and Urban Well-Being

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6004

Keywords:

Social policy, Multidimensional, Poverty, Urban inequality, Public programs, Guayaquil

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of social policies on multidimensional poverty in the city of Guayaquil, Ecuador, focusing on the effectiveness of public programs implemented during the last decade. A quantitative, non-experimental and cross-sectional research design was applied, using secondary data from official national surveys and institutional reports. The Multidimensional Poverty Index was employed as the main analytical framework, considering dimensions such as education, health, housing conditions, employment, and access to basic services. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were used to examine variations in poverty levels and their association with selected social policies. The results indicate a moderate reduction in multidimensional poverty, particularly in dimensions related to access to basic services and education; however, persistent deprivations remain in employment quality and housing conditions. The discussion highlights that while social policies have contributed positively to improving certain living standards, their impact has been uneven across population groups and urban areas, revealing structural limitations in program targeting and sustainability. The study concludes that social policies in Guayaquil have generated partial improvements in multidimensional poverty reduction, but stronger intersectoral coordination, continuous monitoring, and a territorial approach are required to achieve more equitable and lasting outcomes. These findings provide relevant evidence for policymakers and contribute to the academic debate on urban poverty and social policy effectiveness in developing contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Fernanda Moreira Macías, Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI), Ecuador

Ingeniera Comercial por la Universidad Técnica de Manabi (UTM), Master en Gestión del Talento Humano por la Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Master en intervención social en las sociedades del conocimiento por la Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR), Doctoranda en Trabajo Social por la Universidad Rovira i Virgilio de España (URV), Docente Titular Investigadora de la Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI).

References

Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006

Alkire, S., Foster, J., & Santos, M. E. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford University Press.

Alkire, S., Roche, J. M., Santos, M. E., & Seth, S. (2015). Identifying the poorest people and groups: Strategies using the global multidimensional poverty index. Journal of International Development, 27(3), 362–387.

Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014). Measuring acute poverty in the developing world. In A. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 439–478). Elsevier.

Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014). Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Development, 59, 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026

Díaz, M., & Gómez, L. (2021). Visual representations of inequality in urban poverty studies. The Visual Review, 8(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1386/visr_00045_1

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2018). Social policies in Latin America: Design, implementation and evaluation. United Nations.

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2019). Social panorama of Latin America 2019. United Nations.

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2019). Social panorama of Latin America. https://www.cepal.org

Kaztman, R. (2010). Territorial inequalities and social policies in Latin American cities. In R. Di Virgilio & M. Rodríguez (Eds.), Urban inequality in Latin America (pp. 87–112). CLACSO.

Kaztman, R. (2018). La ciudad fragmentada: respuestas de política social urbana [The fragmented city: Urban social policy responses]. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Kaztman, R., & Retamoso, A. (2007). Segregation, employment and poverty in Latin American cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(2), 185–209.

López, J., & Herrera, M. (2023). Urban inequality and visual methods: A multidimensional approach. The Visual Review, 10(2), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1386/visr_00078_1

Martínez, P., & Rojas, C. (2022). Visualizing multidimensional poverty: Territory, data and social policy. The Visual Review, 9(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1386/visr_00062_1

National Institute of Statistics and Census. (2022). Multidimensional poverty in Ecuador. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec

Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. (2023). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index. https://ophi.org.uk

Ponce, J. (2016). Análisis de la pobreza multidimensional y políticas sociales en el Ecuador [Multidimensional poverty and social policies in Ecuador] (Doctoral dissertation). Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO), Quito, Ecuador.

Rivera, L., Cárdenas, B., & Díaz, A. (2022). Poverty, inequality and visual narratives in Latin American cities. The Visual Review, 9(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1386/visr_00069_1

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. Asian Development Bank.

United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Human development report 2010: The real wealth of nations. UNDP. https://www.undp.org

United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human development report 2023/2024. https://www.undp.org

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Moreira Macías, M. F. (2026). Impact of Social Policies on Multidimensional Poverty in Guayaquil: Empirical Evaluation of Public Programs and Urban Well-Being. Prisma Social Journal, (52), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6004

Issue

Section

Sección abierta