The phenomenon of donations on streaming platforms
Perceptions of digital spending among university students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6022Keywords:
Digital donations, Live streaming, Spending perception, Creator economy, Consumer behaviorAbstract
The expansion of "digital donations" has reshaped contemporary media consumption, integrating microtransaction systems that allow for the monetization of social interaction in real time. In this scenario, streaming platforms have normalized financial outlay, raising new questions about how digital natives psychologically process this dematerialized spending. The main objective of this research was to determine the relationship between streaming donations and the perception of digital spending among university students in Lima. Methodologically, a quantitative approach was applied using a non-experimental correlational design. The sample consisted of 202 students selected through purposive sampling due to their expert user profile. They were evaluated with an instrument that reported high internal consistency (0.929). Statistical analysis, performed using Spearman's rho coefficient, revealed a very strong positive correlation (.866; p < .000). This finding indicates that donation behavior explains a large part of the variance in students' financial cognition. Far from acting impulsively, the study demonstrates that expert users employ virtual currency as a deliberate investment to gain status and visibility within the community. It concludes that greater immersion in the platform leads to greater cognitive maturity in managing budgets, challenging the traditional notion that virtuality negates awareness of the value of money.
Downloads
References
Alsaati, T., & Saleh, M. (2026). Investigating the Impact of E-Tipping Motives on Brand Favorability: Evidence from Restaurants in Saudi Arabia. Tourism and Hospitality, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7010018
Bai, S., Gu, X., Xu, N., Zheng, J., Wu, W., Jiang, M., & Xue, N. (2025). Live streaming mode selection strategy under the background of virtual anchor supplementation. PLoS ONE, 20(4), e0321557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321557
Chalaby, J. K. (2024). The streaming industry and the platform economy: An analysis. Media, Culture and Society, 46(3), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231210439
Colbjørnsen, T. (2021). The streaming network: Conceptualizing distribution economy, technology, and power in streaming media services. Convergence, 27(5), 1264–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520966911
Chu, T. H., & Chu, W. H. (2025). Why do some watch while others donate? An S-O-R Perspective of live streaming engagement. Information & Management, 62(8), 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104235
Cyrek, B., & Popiołek, M. (2024). Audience Generated Content Management-Live Streamers’ Strategies to Overcome Unwanted Donations. Communication and Society, 37(3), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.3.73-89
Edmond, M., Khoo, O., Perkins, C., & Trott, V. (2024). Streaming diversity: Studying screen diversity in the streaming era. Convergence, 30(4), 1315–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241270887
Fargetta, G., Ortis, A., Battiato, S., & Scrimali, L. R. M. (2025). Analyzing interactions in donation-based live streaming platforms: a multi-leader-follower game approach. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01443-w
Ge, M., Bao, X., Yang, K., Wang, S., & Lau, R. Y. K. (1 C.E.). From Praise to Sarcasm: Exploring the Dynamic Impact of Fine-Grained Sentiments on Tipping Using LLMs. Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?Doi=10.4018/JGIM.395848, 33(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.395848
Gómez, D. C., & Miguel, A. G. (2023). Patrones de consumo y entretenimiento digital juvenil: Una mirada sociológica al gasto en plataformas de suscripción, creadores de contenido y gaming. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 20(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.84855
Gong, M., Bao, X., & Wagner, C. (2023). Why viewers send paid gifts: The role of social influence on massively multiplayer online games live streaming. Information Processing & Management, 60(4), 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103371
Jhang-Li, J. H., & Liou, J. H. (2024). An analysis of operating strategy for a video live streaming platform: advertisement, advertorial, and donation. Information Technology and Management, 25(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00387-x
Jiménez-Prado, C. (2024). Twitch, la televisión de la generación Z. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31637/EPSIR-2024-626
Jin, R., Liu, X., & Murata, T. (2024). Predicting potential real-time donations in YouTube live streaming services via continuous-time dynamic graphs. In Machine Learning (Vol. 113, Number 4). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-023-06449-z
Kharismanto, D., & Phahlevy, R. R. (2024). Legal Liability of Streamers Recipients of Donations From Online Gambling Sites. International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science, 1(10), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.61796/ijblps.v1i10.226
Kneisel, A., & Sternadori, M. (2023). Effects of parasocial affinity and gender on live streaming fans’ motivations. Convergence, 29(2), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221114461
Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 47-47. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823
Klug, D., & Qiu, H. S. (2021). Motivations and Expectations for Virtual Gift-Giving in Douyin Live Streams. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12194
Kunigita, H., Javed, A., & Kohda, Y. (2023). Solicited PWYW donations on social live streaming services through reciprocal actions between streamers and viewers. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12(June), 100339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100339
Lee, Y. E., Ahn, D., Kwon, J. Y., Lee, S. J., & Lim, H. (2025). Understanding Digital Gifting Through Messengers Across Cultures: A Comparative Study of University Students in South Korea, China, and Japan. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(7), 0–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3757689
Li, W., Mao, Y., & Liu, C. (2022). Understanding the intention to donate online in the Chinese context: The influence of norms and trust. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2022-1-7
Lin, L. C. S. (2021). Virtual gift donation on live streaming apps: the moderating effect of social presence. Communication Research and Practice, 7(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.1889190
Magano, J., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., & Sánchez-Bayón, A. (2025). Exploring Twitch Viewers’ Donation Intentions from a Dual Perspective: Uses and Gratifications Theory and the Practice of Freedom. Information, 16(8), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16080708
Plaza de la Hoz, J., Espinosa Zárate, Z., & Camilli Trujillo, C. (2024). Digitalisation and poverty in Latin America: a theoretical review with a focus on education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03692-0
Rich, B. R. (2021). Streaming Hope, Streaming Despair, Still Streaming. Film Quarterly, 74(3), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1525/FQ.2021.74.3.5
Rieder, B., Borra, E., Coromina, Ò., & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2023). Making a Living in the Creator Economy: A Large-Scale Study of Linking on YouTube. Social Media and Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231180628
Scarmato, A. (2022). Thinking about the purpose of research methodology. A journey through the production of data and designs. Revista Latinoamericana De Metodología De Las Ciencias Sociales, 12(2), e122. https://doi.org/10.24215/18537863e122
Serrano-Malebrán, J., Campos-Núñez, F., Veneros-Alquinta, D., Meza-Espinoza, N., Alfaro-Tirado, I., & Cucho-Solano, J. (2025). Understanding viewer support in video game streaming: key insights into donation drivers. Frontiers in Communication, 10(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1648927
Shi, Y., & Wu, C. (2023). The influencing factor model and empirical research of TikTok charity live streaming impact users’ online charitable donation. PLoS ONE, 18(11 November), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294186
Tang, W., & Wei, M. (2023). Streaming media business strategies and audience-centered practices: A comparative study of Netflix and Tencent Video. Online Media and Global Communication, 2(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2022-0061
Toro, R., Peña-Sarmiento, M., Avendaño-Prieto, B. L., Mejía-Vélez, S., & Bernal-Torres, A. (2022). Empirical Analysis of Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient as a Function of Question Response Options, Sample Size and Outliers. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicologica, 63(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP63.2.02
Veriansyah, S., Tinggi, S., & Surakarta, I. E. (2024). User and Gratifications Theory in Knowing Donation Intentions During Live Streaming. Journal of Social Science and Business Studies, 2(4), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v2i4.121
Yoganathan, V., Osburg, V. S., & Stevens, C. J. (2021). Freedom and giving in game streams: A Foucauldian exploration of tips and donations on Twitch. Psychology and Marketing, 38(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21483
Zhang, Z., & Liu, F. (2024). Gift-giving intentions in pan-entertainment live streaming: Based on social exchange theory. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0296908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296908
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).








