Explorando el rol de la sociedad civil organizada en iniciativas de Perú-México-Colombia en el cumplimiento de la Agenda 2030

Eduardo José Campechano Escalona; Isabel Cristina Díaz de Campechano; Gioconda Carmela Bellomo Montalvo; Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales; Giovanni Pérez Ortega; Manuel Peñalver-Higuera

doi:10.65598/rps.5848

Autores/as

Eduardo Campechano-Escalona Universidad César Vallejo. Escuela de Posgrado.
Isabel Cristina Díaz de Campechano Universidad César Vallejo. Programa Segunda Especialidad
Gioconda Carmela Bellomo Montalvo Universidad César Vallejo. Escuela de Posgrado
Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales Facultad de Administración de Empresas. Universidad Estatal de Sonora
Giovanni Pérez Ortega Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Departamento de Ingeniería de Organización.
Manuel Peñalver-Higuera Centro de Altos Estudios Nacionales Escuela de Posgrado-Lima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.5848

Palabras clave:

Agenda 2030, 5P, Sociedad civil organizada, Gobernanza, Perú, México, Colombia

Resumen

Este artículo aborda el papel que desarrolla la Sociedad civil organizada (SCO) de Perú, México y Colombia para la implementación de la Agenda 2030. El objetivo fue analizar bajo un enfoque comparativo los aportes, área de acción y desafíos que existen en estos países a partir de las 5P. El estudio responde al paradigma interpretativo con un enfoque cualitativo para realizar un análisis hermenéutico del contenido de los portales de las ONG de Colombia, México y Perú haciendo uso del Atlas TI. Utilizando una matriz de contenido para la recolección de los datos que se declararon en la misión y visión de cada una de las iniciativas analizadas, se obtuvieron una serie de categorías y subcategorías que permitieron reconstruir nubes de palabras y un diagrama Sankey a partir de las 5P de la Agenda 2030. Estos resultados destacan la importancia de fortalecer desde las universidades las capacidades de la SCO para promover la participación ciudadana y fomentar la colaboración entre los diferentes actores involucrados. Entre las consideraciones finales se resalta el rol de las Instituciones de Educación Superior como actores claves para configurar un modelo de gobernanza con planes de acción que se adapten a las realidades de cada país, con el fin de maximizar el impacto de la SCO en la consecución de la Agenda 2030.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Amiraslani, F., & Caiserman, A. (2018). Multi-stakeholder and multi-level interventions to tackle climate change and land degradation: The case of Iran. Sustainability, 10(2000), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062000

ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH [ATLAS.ti v.9 Windows]. (2022). https://atlasti.com

Azubuike, P. C., Imo, U. F., Ogbonna, C. K., Enyam, M. O., & Nwadiche, M. (2024). Harnessing religion in the pursuit of sustainable development in Nigeria. Discover Global Society, 2(87). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00119-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00119-8

Banerjee, A., Murphy, E., & Walsh, P. P. (2020). Perceptions of multistakeholder partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals: A case study of Irish non-state actors. Sustainability, 12(21), 8872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218872

Bauknecht, D. et al. (2020). Exploring the pathways: Regulatory experiments for sustainable development – An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 9(3), 49–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv9i3art4

Bajtín, M. (1985). Literatura, cultura y tiempo histórico. Textos y contextos.

Bergen, N. et al. (2019). Subnational health management and the advancement of health equity: A case study of Ethiopia. Global Health Research and Policy, 4, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0105-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0105-3

Boadu, E. S. (2024). Evaluating Ghana’s youth-centered food-security policies: A collaborative governance approach. Sustainability, 16(9), 3830. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093830

Chung, R. K., Margolin, A. M., & Vyakina, I. V. (2023). Theory and practice of ESG transformation of management systems. Economic Policy, 18(2), 80–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2023-2-80-103

Cisneros, P. (2019). What makes collaborative water governance partnerships resilient to policy change? Ecology and Society, 24(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10667-240129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10667-240129

Cleary, S. (2017). Reconceptualising transnational governance: Making global institutions fit for purpose. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-21

Creswell, J. W, & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications

Delabre, I., Alexander, A., & Rodrigues, C. (2020). Strategies for tropical forest protection and sustainable supply chains: Challenges and opportunities for alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 15, 1637–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00747-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00747-z

Di Nauta, P., Iannuzzi, E., Milone, M., & Nigro, C. (2020). The impact of the sustainability principles on the strategic planning and reporting of universities: An exploratory study on a qualified Italian sample. Sustainability, 12(18), 7269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187269

Durston J (2003) Qué es el Capital Social Comunitario. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL. Chile. Documento en línea Disponible: http://www.ieclac.cl/publicaciones/

Eco, U. (1995). Tratado de semiótica general. (5ta. ed.). Gedisa.

Espinosa, C., & Rangel, G. (2022). What roles do civil society organizations play in monitoring and reviewing the Sustainable Development Goals? An exploration of cases from Ecuador, Colombia, and Argentina. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 5(1), 2143669. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2143669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2143669

Fortune, K., Becerra-Posada, F., Buss, P., Galvão, L. A. C., Contreras, A., Murphy, M., & Rogger, C. (2018). Health promotion and the agenda for sustainable development, WHO Region of the Americas. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96(9), 621–626. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.204404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.204404

Galvão, T. G., Bastos Lima, M. G., & Ramiro, R. (2023). Bottom-up regionality and the Sustainable Development Goals. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 66(2), e021. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202300221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202300221

Glandon, D., Meghani, A., Jessani, N., Qiu, M., & Bennett, S. (2018). Identifying health policy and systems research priorities on multisectoral collaboration for health in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 3(e000970). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000970

Grek, S. (2020). Prophets, saviours and saints: Symbolic governance and the rise of a transnational metrological field. International Review of Education, 66, 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09844-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09844-z

Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. En N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-194). Sage Publications.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed., pp. 102-256). McGraw-Hill.

Hilbrich, S., & Schwab, J. (2018). Towards a more accountable G20? Accountability mechanisms of the G20 and the new challenges posed to them by the 2030 Agenda. International Organisations Research Journal, 13(4), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-04-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-04-01

Hussein, H. et al. (2018). Monitoring transboundary water cooperation in SDG 6.5.2. Sustainability, 10(3640). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103640

Maniglio, F., & Barboza da Silva, R. (2021). El Análisis Crítico del Discurso y el giro decolonial ¿Por qué y para qué? Critical Discourse Studies, 18(1), 156-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1754871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1754871

Nwauche, S., & Flanigan, S. T. (2022). Challenges to nonprofit organization participation in social and development policy planning in South Africa. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 13(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2021-0049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2021-0049

Raszkowski, A., & Bartniczak, B. (2019). On the road to sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Poland. Sustainability, 11(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020366

Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (2021). Integrating human rights and the environment in supply chain regulations. Sustainability, 13(9666). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179666

Shanthosh, J., Muvva, K., Woodward, M., Vijeyarasa, R., & Palagyi, A. (2022). Assessing the reach, scope and outcomes of government action on women’s health and human rights: A protocol for the development of an international women’s rights dataset. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221114741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221114741

Supaat, K., Aziz, S., Hasan, S. Z., Ahmad Basri, N. E., & Mohd Shafie, S. H. (2024). Universities and sustainable development: Options to help ‘walk the talk’. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4751

Vanderslott, S. (2019). Moving from outsider to insider status through metrics: The inclusion of “neglected tropical diseases” into the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(4), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1574727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1574727

Van Dijk, T. (1999). Ideología. Un enfoque Multidisciplinario. Gedisa Editorial.

Wibeck, V., & Linnér, B.-O. (2021). Sensemaking analysis: A framework for multi-strategy and cross-country research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921998907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921998907

Wiesner, C. (2022, October 28). Doing qualitative and interpretative research: reflecting principles and principled challenges. Political Research Exchange, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2022.2127372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2127372

Wilson, D. C. (2023). Learning from the past to plan for the future: An historical review of the evolution of waste and resource management 1970–2020 and reflections on priorities 2020–2030. Waste Management & Research, 41(12), 1754–1813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231178025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231178025

Yamada, S. (2024). The synchronic and diachronic evolution of key themes around SDG 4. International Review of Education, 70, 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-024-10078-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-024-10078-6