Female Scientific Sources.
Practices and Barriers in Their Media Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.5928Keywords:
Women scientists, media, women visibility, expert sources, genderAbstract
Despite the sustained increase of women in scientific and technological fields, their presence as expert sources in the media remains limited, generating inequalities in both the dissemination of knowledge and the symbolic construction of scientific authority. This study examines the visibility of women scientists in the public sphere through a quantitative methodology based on two surveys: one administered to women researchers, and another to science journalism professionals in Spain. The results indicate that although the database is valued as a useful tool, its incorporation into journalistic routines remains marginal. Women scientists identify structural barriers related to time constraints and limited institutional recognition, as well as symbolic obstacles linked to self-perception of authority and public exposure. Journalists, in turn, point to limitations arising from time pressure, reliance on habitual sources, and the lack of training in gender-sensitive practices. The discussion highlights strong alignment between both groups regarding the absence of direct and stable interactions as the main factor hindering the inclusion of female experts in media coverage. In conclusion, improving the visibility of women scientists requires institutional strategies, specific training, and the systematic integration of tools such as the AMIT database into journalistic practices to promote a more plural, equitable, and socially relevant scientific communication.
Downloads
References
AcademiaNet. (s.f.). The portal to excellent women academics. https://www.academia-net.org
Aladro Vico, E., Padilla Castillo, G., Requeijo Rey, P., Semova, D. J., García Agustín, J., García Nieto, M. T., & Viñarás Abad, M. (2014). La presencia y representación de la mujer científica en la prensa española. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 69, 176–194. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1007
Asociación de Mujeres Investigadoras y Tecnólogas AMIT. (s.f.). Base de datos de investigadoras y tecnólogas. https://cientificas.amit-es.org/
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2006). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?. Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
Campos-Rueda, M., & Herrera-Damas, S. (2021a). Bases de datos de mujeres expertas: Escenario global y situación en España. Profesional de la Información, 30(2), e300207. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.07
Campos-Rueda, M., & Herrera-Damas, S. (2021b). La ausencia de perspectiva de género en los procesos de búsqueda y selección de las fuentes expertas que comparecen en televisión. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 27(3), 793–811. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.71820
Cobreros, L., Galindo, J., & Raigada, T. (2024). Mujeres en STEM. Desde la educación básica hasta la carrera laboral. ESADE https://www.esade.edu/ecpol/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Mujeres-en-STEM-2024-1.pdf
CSIC. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas de España (2023). Informe Mujeres Investigadoras 2023. Comisión de Mujeres y Ciencia del CSIC. https://www.csic.es/sites/default/files/2024-07/IMI_2023.pdf
European Commission (2025). She figures 2024: gender in research and innovation : statistics and indicators. Publications Office of the European Union. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/592260.
FECYT. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (2023). Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología en España 2022. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología. https://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/percepcion-social-de-la-ciencia-y-la-tecnologia-en-espana-2022
FECYT. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (2025). Participación de las científicas como fuentes expertas en los medios: motivaciones y obstáculos. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología. https://doi.org/10.58121/7K55-HQ79
Francescutti, P. (2018). La visibilidad de las científicas españolas. Fundación Dr. Antoni Esteve (Cuadernos 44). https://mujeresconciencia.com/2018/09/05/la-visibilidad-de-las-cientificas-espanolas/
García-Jiménez, L., Torrado-Morales, S., & Díaz Tomás, J. M. (2022). El rol de la mujer en la ciencia y la docencia en comunicación: Análisis a partir de los programas universitarios en España. Revista de Comunicación, 21(2), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC21.2-2022-A5
García-Silva, E., Perez-Suarez, S., Zavala-Parrales, A., Meléndez-Anzures, F.E. & Dominguez, A. (2025). Continuing education of academic women in STEM: perspectives on mentoring and professional roles. Frontiers in Education 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1473331
GMMP Global Media Monitoring Project (2020). Reporte final del GMMP. https://whomakesthenews.org/gmmp-2020-final-reports/
Gorosarri González M. (2024). Periodismo feminista: una aproximación conceptual. Historia y Comunicación Social, 29(2), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.98681
Grañeras Pastrana, M., Moreno Sánchez, M. E., Isidoro Calle, N., Vaquero Jiménez, J., Recio Muñiz, M., Salgado Ferreiro, E., & Rico, C. (2022). Radiografía de la brecha de género en la formación STEAM: Un estudio en detalle de la trayectoria educativa de niñas y mujeres en España. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. http://bit.ly/45pxTB7
Herrero, E., & García-Jiménez, L. (2023). De una “presencia invisibilizada” a ser “buenas chicas”: Roles de mujeres investigadoras en el campo de la comunicación (1930–1990). Methadatos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v11i2.720
León, B., Moreno, C., Revuelta, G., Refojo, C. & Sanz, E. (Coords) (2024). Informando de ciencia con ciencia. FECYT, Asociación Española de Comunicación Científica, Fundación Lilly y The Conversation. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, S. A. U. https://www.fecyt.es/system/files/2024-08/informando_de_ciencia_con_ciencia_fundacionlilly_0.pdf
Magaña-Medina, D. E., & Hernández-Mena, V. (2022). Diferencias de género en ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas. Estereotipos y discriminación. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, (28), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7487205
Mellado, C. (2015). Professional roles in news content: Six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.922276
Observatorio Mujeres, Ciencia e Innovación (OMCI). (2021). Estudio sobre la situación de las jóvenes investigadoras en España. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. http://bit.ly/4otdqUF
Perianes Pain, R. (Coord.). (2019), Palabra de Mujer. Manual con enfoque de género para profesionales del periodismo, Asociación de la Prensa de Cáceres. http://bit.ly/4fwPQ5p
Rovetto, F. (2010). Androcentrismo y medios de comunicación: La representación de las mujeres en la prensa de actualidad. Cuadernos Info, (27), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.27.21
Speer, J.D. (2023). Bye bye Ms. American Sci: Women and the leaky STEM pipeline. Economics of Education Review, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102371
Stefani, A., Minor, R., Leuze, K. & Strauss, S. (2024). Empirical challenges in assessing the “leaky STEM pipeline”: how the research design affects the measurement of women’s underrepresentation in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education 11 (54). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00512-4
UNESCO. (2021). To be smart, the digital revolution will need to be inclusive: UNESCO science report. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375429
Yang, T., Bao, J., & Leung, M.D., (2025). Approaching or avoiding? Gender asymmetry in reactions to prior job search outcomes by gig workers in female- versus male-typed job domains. Social Forces, 103 (4),1350–1373. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaf011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).











