Women at the Digital Crossroads
Intersectionality, Vulnerability, and Technological Exclusion in Disadvantaged Sectors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6033Keywords:
Digital divide, divideGender, Social vulnerability, vulnerabilityIntersectionality, Technological exclusionAbstract
The gender digital divide transcends mere material access to devices, manifesting as exclusion from effective participation in digital environments, which particularly affects women from vulnerable sectors. This cross-sectional exploratory study with a quantitative approach, grounded in an intersectional perspective, analyzes this gap using a sample of 21 women from vulnerable neighborhoods, selected through purposive non-probability sampling. A structured questionnaire was administered in face-to-face interviews, and descriptive statistical analysis was performed. The findings reveal a significant age concentration among women over 45 (47.6%), severe educational exclusion (95.2% lack secondary education), and extreme job insecurity (85.7% of participants). Of particular relevance, all participants exhibit exclusive technological dependence on mobile phones with unstable connectivity and basic instrumental skills, resulting in critical digital competencies. The results are consistent with international literature on the persistence of the gender digital divide in vulnerable contexts, where digital exclusion is both a consequence and a perpetuating factor of broader educational, labor, and social marginalization. There is a predominance of superficial use of technologies without meaningful integration into educational, employment, or civic participation processes, perpetuating cycles of dependency, informational isolation, and generalized vulnerability. The findings underscore that digital exclusion is associated with multiple intersecting vulnerabilities that require specific interventions differentiated according to age cohorts, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches that combine technological access, digital literacy, and gender-sensitive policies to break this vicious cycle.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Sociología y cultura. Grijalbo.
Brey, E., Gómez, M. V. y Domínguez, M. (2023). Redes de apoyo y arraigos locales en mujeres de barrios vulnerables de la Comunidad de Madrid. Revista Española de Sociología, 32(4), a187. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2023.187
Castaño, C., Vázquez, S., Martín, J. y Martínez, J. L. (2009). La brecha digital de género: amantes y distantes. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://acortar.link/3BtW1e
Cervera-Quijano, M.C.; Canto-Esquivel, J.C. y Ojeda-López, R.N. (2024). Descifrando la brecha de género en la era digital. Lúmina, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v25.n2.5076.2024
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
De Andrés, S., Collado, R. y García-Lomas, J.I. (2020). Brechas digitales de género. una revisión del concepto. Etic@net. Revista científica electrónica de Educación y Comunicación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, 20(1), 34-58. https://doi.org/10.30827/eticanet.v20i1.15521
De la Peña, I. J. y Acosta, E. (2025). Determinantes de la brecha digital y estrategias para su reducción: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. CIENCIA Ergo-Sum, 32(1), 47-64. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=10113651
EAPN España. (2022). Estudio: Brecha digital, rural y de género. https://acortar.link/zSNg59
García-Leal, M., Medrano-Rodríguez, H., Vázquez-Acevedo, J. A., Romero-Rojas, J. C. y Berrún-Castañón, L. N. (2021). Brecha digital de género en docentes de educación básica durante pandemia por COVID-19. Revista Andina de Educación, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2021.5.1.4
Gutiérrez-Provecho, L., López-Aguado, M., García, J.L. y Quintana, J. (2021). La brecha digital en población en riesgo de exclusión social. Revista Pedagogía Social, 39, 123-138. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2021.39.08
IFIMAC-UAM. (2024). Las mujeres en la tecnología: Radiografía al sector STEM en España. Prensa Ibérica, Extra, 1-9. https://short-url.org/1hqDK
Lázaro, D., Valente, M. y Ortiz-Repiso, V. (2022). Pesquisa científica na pós-graduação: elementos da competencia informacional em formato de objeto de aprendizagem. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 27(1), 3-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/3669
Martínez, M. D. R. (2025). La brecha digital de género y el necesario impulso de políticas inclusivas en la doble transición. Cielo Laboral, 3(1), 13-25. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=10093919
ONTSI. (2025). Brecha digital de género: Edición 2025 – Datos 2024. Ministerio para la Transformación Digital y de la Función Pública, Gobierno de España. https://www.ontsi.es/sites/ontsi/files/2025-03/_0.pdf
Oyedemi, T. (2014) Beyond access: Youth and digital skills, Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 40(2), 137-154, https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2014.907191
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books. https://n9.cl/me86x
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
Quinaluisa, K. (2025). La brecha digital de género y su impacto en el aprendizaje de estudiantes de tercer semestre de educación de la Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Ecuador. Reincisol, 4(7), 3924-3942. https://doi.org/10.59282/reincisol.V4(7)3924-3942
Sanders, M. (2008). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26. . http://hdl.handle.net/10919/51616
Toma, R. B. (2021). De STEM nos gusta todo menos STEM. Análisis crítico del concepto de educación STEM. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 39(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3093
Torabian, J. E., Hadjar, A. y Toom, A. (2025). Digitalisation, Inclusion, and Exclusion in Higher Education: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://acortar.link/0Vq0EK
UNESCO. (2019). UNESCO strategy for youth and adult literacy (2020-2025). General Conference, 40th. https://unesdo c.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371411
UNESCO. (2024). Qué necesita saber acerca del aprendizaje digital y la inclusión. Recuperado el 26 de septiembre de 2025, de https://www.unesco.org/es/educación-digital/need-kn
Varela, S.D., Valencia, A.M., Pérez, M.B., Flores, V.M., Ordoñez, K.H. y Arboleda, M.F. (2025). Hacia una educación interseccional: sistematización crítica de perspectivas y prácticas. Revista de la Educación y el Deporte, 3(1), 244-261. https://revistaced.com/index.php/home/article/download/93/384
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).








