Aproximación educativa a percepciones sobre riesgos online y protección de datos personales

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6015

Palabras clave:

Educación digital, Riesgos online, Prevención de fraudes y estafas online, Protección de datos personales, Uso seguro y responsable de Internet

Resumen

Los riesgos online asociados a las estafas o fraudes con dispositivos tecnológicos y a los datos personales, son cada vez más frecuentes, por lo que es importante comprender la percepción del riesgo que sobre ellos tienen los ciudadanos. Algunos estudios señalan a la formación como uno de los principales retos que ayudarán a afrontar riesgos y problemas derivados del uso de la tecnología y necesarios tanto en zonas urbanas como rurales. En este estudio cuasi experimental de tipo mixto se aplica una escala de percepción de riesgo y de ella, se analizan 15 ítems sobre percepciones de 239 ciudadanos y sus experiencias centradas en relaciones y comunicación, problemas de fraudes y estafas online y datos personales. Los resultados muestran que los ciudadanos perciben mucho y/o demasiado riesgo en la mayor parte de las acciones y en general poco riesgo en las compras online. Narran problemas de suplantación de identidad por extravío de móvil, phishing, tratamiento de datos personales y otros. Algunos de ellos asociados a buenas prácticas y estrategias para afrontarlos y así evitar conscientemente adoptar conductas de riesgo en situaciones cotidianas cada vez más habituales en la sociedad digital.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Norma Torres-Hernández, Universidad de Jaén, España

Doctora en Ciencias de la Educación (Universidad de Granada). Estudios en Pedagogía e Investigación y Currículum y Formación, Educación Primaria, Comunicación y Protección de datos en la sociedad digital. Investiga sobre la competencia digital, el uso seguro y responsable de Internet, la protección de datos en el ámbito educativo, los derechos digitales en la sociedad del conocimiento y la evaluación formativa. Ha sido colaboradora en proyectos de investigaciones nacionales y locales. Miembro del Grupo de investigación HUM386 (FORCE) de la UGR. Profesora sustituta interina en la Universidad de Jaén con experiencia docente en niveles secundaria y universidad en México y España.

Citas

Al-Qahtani, A. & Cresci, S. (2022). The COVID’19 scamdemic: A survey of phishing attacks and their countermeasures during COVID’19. IET Information Security, 16(5), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1049/ise2.12073

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2022). Personal Fraud. Reference period: 2020-21 financial year. http://sl.ugr.es/0e1r

Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S. & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424

Button, M. & Cross, C. (2017). Cyber Frauds, Scams and their Victims. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679877

Byrne, Z.S., Dvorak, K.J., Peters, J.M., Ray, I., Howe, A. & Sanchez, D. (2016). From the User's Perspective: Perceptions of Risk Relative to Benefit Associated with Using the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.024

Chatterjee, S., Kar, A.K., Dwivedi, Y.K. & Kizgin, H. (2019). Prevention of cybercrimes in smart cities of India: from a citizen’s perspective. Information Technology & People, 32(5),1153-1183. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2018-0251

Coluccia, A., Pozza, A., Ferretti, F., Carabellese, F., Masti, A. & Gualtieri, G. (2020). Online Romance Scams: Relational Dynamics and Psychological Characteristics of the Victims and Scammers. A Scoping Review. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 1, 24-35. http://doi.org/10.2174/1745017902016010024

Cook, A. (2020). COVID-19: Companies and verticals at risk for cyber attacks. Reliaquest. http://sl.ugr.es/0e1y

Council of Europe (2001). Convention on Cybercrime. European Treaty Series, 185. https://rm.coe.int/1680081561

Council of Europe (2019). Digital Citizenship Education Handbook. https://rm.coe.int/168093586f

Cross, C., Smith, R.G. & Richards, K. (2014). Challenges of responding to online fraud victimization in Australia. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice, (474), 1-6. http://sl.ugr.es/0e1z

Crowne-Mohammed, E., & Andreacchi, R. (2009). The (Un)availability of Commons Law Remedies for Victims of Online Gambling Fraud. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 13(4). http://doi.org/10.1089/gire.2009.13405

De Kimpe, L., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., Snaphaan, T., Pauwels, L. & Hardyns, W. (2020). Help, I need somebody: Examining the antecedents of social support seeking among cybercrime victims. Computers in human behavior, 108, 106310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106310

Dodel, M. & Mesch, G. (2018). Inequality in digital skills and the adoption of online safety behaviors, Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 712-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428652

European Commission (2021). 2030 Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. http://sl.ugr.es/0e1q

Fenge, L.A., & Lee, S. (2018). Understanding the Risks of Financial Scams as Part of Elder Abuse Prevention. The British Journal of Social Work 48(4), 906–923. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy037

Federal Trade Commissión [FTC]. (2023). As Nationwide Fraud Losses Top $10 Billion in 2023, FTC Steps Up Efforts to Protect the Public. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/02/nationwide-fraud-losses-top-10-billion-2023-ftc-steps-efforts-protect-public

Harrell, E. & Langton L. (2013). Victims of identity theft. Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vit12.pdf

Hsieh, H. & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Hu, L., Jiang, Y. & Li, Y. (2019). Optimization Design of Internet Fraud Case Based on Knowledge Graph and Case Teaching. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology, 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323771.3323806

Hussain, D., Ross, P. & Bednar, P. (2018). The Perception of the Benefits and Drawbacks of Internet Usage by the Elderly People. In C. Rossignoli, F. Virili, & S. Za (Eds.), Digital Technology and Organizational Change. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 23,199-212. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62051-0_17

Kaspersky. (2020). Kaspersky Security Bulletin Statistics. http://sl.ugr.es/0e1w

Kirwan, G., Fullwood, C. & Brendan, R. (2018). Risk Factors for Social Networking Site Scam Victimization Among Malaysian Students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 123-128. http://hdl.handle.net/2436/620689

Kopp C., Layton R., Sillitoe J. & Gondal, I. (2015). The Role of Love stories in Romance Scams: A Qualitative Analysis of Fraudulent Profiles. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 9(2), 205-217. http://sl.ugr.es/0e1t

Kumaran, N., & Lugani, S. (2020). Protecting businesses against cyber threats during COVID-19 and beyond. Google Cloud Bolg http://sl.ugr.es/0e1v

Levin, I. & Mamlok, D. (2021). Culture and society in the digital age. Information, 12(2) 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020068

Ma, K.W.F. & McKinnon, T. (2022). COVID-19 and cyber fraud: emerging threats during the pandemic, Journal of Financial Crime, 29 (2), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2021-0016

Mayer, L. (2018). Criminological Elements for the Criminal Legal Analysis of Cybercrime. Ius et Praxis, 24(1), 159-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122018000100159

Mitchell,K., Finkelhor, D. & Becker-Blease, K.A. (2006). Classification of Adults with Problematic Internet Experiences: Linking Internet and Conventional Problems from a Clinical Perspective. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9941

Mitchell, V. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2),163-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910249229

Muniesa, P., Herrera, D., Guerrero, O., Martínez, F., Rubio, M., Gil, V., Santiago, A. & Gómez, M. (2022). Informe sobre la cibercriminalidad en España. Ministerio del Interior. http://sl.ugr.es/0e1p

Norris, G. & Brookes, A. (2021). Personality, Emotion and Individual Differences in Response to Online Fraud. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 109847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109847

Norris, G., Brookes, A. & Dowell, D. (2019). The Psychology of Internet Fraud Victimisation: A Systematic Review. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09334-5

Phiri, J., Lavhengwa, N. & Segooa, M. (2024). Online banking fraud detection: A comparative study of cases from South Africa and Spain. South African Journal of Information Management, 26(1), https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1763

Purkait, S., Kumar De, S. & Suar, D. (2014). An Empirical Investigation of the Factor that Influence Internet User’s Ability to Correctly Identify a Phishing Website. Information Management & Computer Security, 22(3), 194-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMCS-05-2013-0032

Reynolds, L. & Parker, L. (2018). Digital resilience: Stronger citizens online. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. http://sl.ugr.es/0cGT

Ribble, M., Bailey, G. & Ross, T. (2004). Digital Citizenship, addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ695788.pdf

Ross, M., Grossmann, I. & Schryer, E. (2014). Contrary to psychological and popular opinion, there is no compelling evidence that older adults are disproportionately victimized by consumer fraud. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614535935

Segura, J. (2017). Compromised LinkedIn accounts used to send phishing links via private message and InMail. Malwarebytes Labs http://sl.ugr.es/0e1x

Sorell, T. & Whitty, M. (2019). Online Romance Scams and Victimhood. Security Journal, 32(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-019-00166-w

Torres-Hernández, N., Gallego-Arrufat, M.J., & García-Ruiz, M.M. (2023). Citizens’ reflections on an open, distance intergenerational program for online risk prevention. Digital Education Review. Universidad de Barcelona. 41, 35-53. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/download/41067/41068/124507

Torres-Hernández, N., García-Martínez, I., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2022) Internet Risk Perception. Development and Validation of a Scale for Adults. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 12, 1581–1593. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ejihpe12110111

Wang, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Mao, Y. & Wang, P. (2017). The impact research of online reviews’ sentiment polarity presentation on consumer purchase decisions. Information Technology & People, 30(3), 522-541. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2014-0116

Wei. R., Liu., X.S. & Liu, X. (2019). Examining the Perceptual and Behavioral Effects of Mobile Internet Fraud: A Social Network Approach. Telematics and Informatics, 41,103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.04.002

Whittaker,J., Edwards, M.,Cross, C. & Button, M. (2023). I Have Only Checked after the Event. Consumer Approaches to Safe Online Shopping, Victims & Offenders, 18(7), 1259-1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2022.2130486

Williams, E.J., Beardmore, A. & Joinson, A. (2017). Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Online Influence: A Theoretical Review. Computer in Human Behavior, 72, 412-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.002

Zhang Z. & Ye Z. (2022). The role of social-psychological factors of victimity on victimization of online fraud in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1030670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030670

Descargas

Publicado

2026-04-30

Cómo citar

Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J., Torres-Hernández, N., García-Ruiz, M. del M., & Teba-López, A. (2026). Aproximación educativa a percepciones sobre riesgos online y protección de datos personales. Revista Prisma Social, (53), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6015

Número

Sección

Sección abierta