Social perceptions regarding the decarbonization of industrial sectors in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6075Keywords:
Industrial decarbonization, Social acceptance, Public perception, Climate policies, Emission-intensive sectorsAbstract
The decarbonization of emission-intensive industrial sectors is a key component in achieving climate commitments, but its viability depends not only on technical and economic factors, but also on social acceptance. This article analyzes public perceptions of industrial decarbonization strategies in Ecuador, with an emphasis on sectors that are difficult to mitigate. An exploratory study was developed based on surveys of 502 adults (>18 years) residing in the country, addressing dimensions such as knowledge, public acceptance, perception of risks and benefits, institutional trust, and willingness to change. The results show a high level of awareness of climate change, contrasted with a low level of familiarity with the concept of decarbonization, which increases indecision regarding support for climate policies. Greater support is observed for measures perceived as tangible, such as the expansion of renewable energies and the improvement of public transportation, while fiscal instruments are less accepted. The acceptance of emerging technologies, such as carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), is strongly influenced by perceptions of safety and prior knowledge. Likewise, trust in universities and scientists far exceeds trust in the government, significantly influencing citizen support. The study concludes that technical education, distributive equity, and institutional transparency are determining factors in strengthening the social legitimacy of industrial decarbonization in Ecuador.
Downloads
References
Abdelaziz, E. A., Saidur, R., & Mekhilef, S. (2011). A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 15, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.003
Al Mamun, A., Yang, M., Hayat, N., Gao, J., & Yang, Q. (2025). The nexus of environmental values, beliefs, norms and green consumption intention. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04979-6
Andrijevskaja, J., & Volkova, A. (2025). Industrial energy use, efficiency, and savings: methods for quantitative analysis. Energy Efficiency, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-025-10367-5
Bachorz, C., Verpoort, P. C., Luderer, G., & Ueckerdt, F. (2025). Exploring techno-economic landscapes of abatement options for hard-to-electrify sectors. Nature Communications , 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59277-1
Barbhuiya, S., Kanavaris, F., Das, B. B., & Idrees, M. (2024). Decarbonising cement and concrete production: Strategies, challenges and pathways for sustainable development. In Journal of Building Engineering (Vol. 86). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108861
Carvajal, R. (2021). Formación Profesional Para Desempleados / As Y Desarrollo Sostenible. Prisma Social-Jovenes y Nuevas Formas de Comunicacion y Marketing, 34.
Chung, C., Kim, J., Sovacool, B. K., Griffiths, S., Bazilian, M., & Yang, M. (2023). Decarbonizing the chemical industry: A systematic review of sociotechnical systems, technological innovations, and policy options. In Energy Research and Social Science (Vol. 96). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102955
Dabla-Norris, E. (2023). Public Support for Climate Change Mitigation Policies: A Cross Country Survey. IMF Working Papers, 2023(223). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400258138.001
Das, R. R., Sussman, R., & Carlson, R. (2025). Trust in scientists, researchers, and environmental organizations associated with policy support for energy transition. Energy and Climate Change, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100179
De la Rosa, D., Giménez, P., & De la Calle, C. (2019). Educación para el desarrollo sostenible: el papel de la universidad en la Agenda 2030. Revista Prisma Social, N°25.
Di Benedetto, A., Wieners, C. E., Dijkstra, H. A., & von der Heydt, A. S. (2025). Political processes affect the feasibility of climate policy in Integrated Assessment Models. Npj Climate Action, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00298-3
Domingues, B. C., Santos, D. M. F., Mateus, M., & Cecílio, D. (2024). Techno-Economic Analysis of Cement Decarbonization Techniques: Oxygen Enrichment vs. Hydrogen Fuel. Hydrogen (Switzerland), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5010005
Gerres, T., Chaves Ávila, J. P., Llamas, P. L., & San Román, T. G. (2019). A review of cross-sector decarbonisation potentials in the European energy intensive industry. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 210). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.036
Guduru, R. K., Tiwari, N., & Mali, J. (2025). Decarbonization technologies and strategies. In Decarbonizing the Petroleum Industry: Current Status, Ongoing Activities, and Future Prospects. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-31524-4.00003-4
Hasan, A. S. M. M., & Trianni, A. (2020). A review of energy management assessment models for industrial energy efficiency. In Energies (Vol. 13, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215713
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. In Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Johnson, O. W., Mete, G., Sanchez, F., Shawoo, Z., & Talebian, S. (2021). Toward climate‐neutral heavy industry: An analysis of industry transition roadmaps. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125375
Kaplan, P. O., Boyd, G., Browning, M., Perl, K., Supekar, S., Victor, N., & Worrell, E. (2025). Is the industrial sector hard to decarbonize or hard to model? A comparative analysis of industrial modeling and net zero carbon dioxide pathways. Energy and Climate Change, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100190
Kern, C., & Jess, A. (2021). Reducing Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Meet Climate Targets—A Comprehensive Quantification and Reasonable Options. Energies, 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175260
Kloo, Y., Nilsson, L. J., & Palm, E. (2024). Reaching net-zero in the chemical industry—A study of roadmaps for industrial decarbonisation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2023.100075
Kumar, A., Tiwari, A. K., & Milani, D. (2024). Decarbonizing hard-to-abate heavy industries: Current status and pathways towards net-zero future. In Process Safety and Environmental Protection (Vol. 187). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.107
Lai, H. L., Devine-Wright, P., Hamilton, J., Mander, S., Clery, D., Rattle, I., Martin, A., Ryder, S., & Taylor, P. (2025). A Place-based, Just Transition framework can guide industrial decarbonisation with a social licence. In Energy Research and Social Science (Vol. 121). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.103967
Leal Filho, W., Ben Hassen, T., Matandirotya, N., & Ng, A. (2025). Empty promises: Some requirements for a successful implementation of decarbonisation strategies in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179409
Li, Z., Sun, L., Zhang, R., & Hanaoka, T. (2024). Decarbonization pathways promote improvements in cement quality and reduce the environmental impact of China’s cement industry. Communications Earth and Environment, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01929-z
Lockwood, M., Herman, K., Iskandarova, M., Pultar, A., Ferrier, J., & Sovacool, B. (2025). Beyond industrial decarbonisation strategy: Lessons from the bottom-up policy mix in the United Kingdom, 2021–2023. Energy Research and Social Science, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104431
Löfgren, Å., Ahlvik, L., van den Bijgaart, I., Coria, J., Jaraitė, J., Johnsson, F., & Rootzén, J. (2024). Green industrial policy for climate action in the basic materials industry. Climatic Change, 177(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03801-7
Lu, X., Tian, W., Li, H., Li, X., Quan, K., & Bai, H. (2023). Decarbonization options of the iron and steelmaking industry based on a three-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-022-2475-7
Malehmirchegini, L., & Chapman, A. J. (2025). Strategies for achieving carbon neutrality within the chemical industry. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 217). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115762
Moffat, K., Lacey, J., Zhang, A., & Leipold, S. (2016). The social licence to operate: A critical review. In Forestry (Vol. 89, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv044
Pan, Q., Held, M., & Backmann, J. (2024). Technological and policy options for the defossilisation of chemical manufacturing. In RSC Sustainability (Vol. 3, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4su00601a
Plank, J. (2025). Decarbonization strategies for the global cement and concrete industry. Highlighting the role of chemical admixtures for successful transition. Revista Alconpat, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.21041/ra.v15i2.819
Rissman, J., Bataille, C., Masanet, E., Aden, N., Morrow, W. R., Zhou, N., Elliott, N., Dell, R., Heeren, N., Huckestein, B., Cresko, J., Miller, S. A., Roy, J., Fennell, P., Cremmins, B., Koch Blank, T., Hone, D., Williams, E. D., de la Rue du Can, S., … Helseth, J. (2020). Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. In Applied Energy (Vol. 266). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848
Rodríguez Diez, J., Tomé-Torquemada, S., Vicente, A., Reyes, J., & Orcajo, G. A. (2023). Decarbonization Pathways, Strategies, and Use Cases to Achieve Net-Zero CO2 Emissions in the Steelmaking Industry. Energies, 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217360
Schulze, M., Nehler, H., Ottosson, M., & Thollander, P. (2016). Energy management in industry - A systematic review of previous findings and an integrative conceptual framework. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 112). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.060
Seijo-Bestilleiro, E., Arias-Fernández, I., Carro-López, D., & Naveiro, M. (2025). Opportunities for Emission Reduction in the Transformation of Petroleum Refining. Fuels, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6030066
Shi, X., Wang, G., Wang, X., & Chen, B. (2024). A Study on the Promoting Role of Renewable Hydrogen in the Transformation of Petroleum Refining Pathways. Processes, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071317
Sovacool, B. K., AbdulRafiu, A., Hudson, M., McManus, M., Korre, A., Marr, I., Howard, C., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2024). Beyond the factory: Ten interdisciplinary lessons for industrial decarbonisation practice and policy. Energy Reports, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.048
Sovacool, B. K., Devine-Wright, P., Mander, S., Rowley, J., & Ryder, S. (2025). Realising a locally-embedded just transition: Sense of place, lived experience, and social perceptions of industrial decarbonisation in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103051
Sovacool, B. K., Iskandarova, M., & Geels, F. W. (2024). Leading the post-industrial revolution? Policy windows, issue linkage and decarbonization dynamics in the UK’s net-zero strategy (2010–2022). Industrial and Corporate Change, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtae015
Thollander, P., & Ottosson, M. (2010). Energy management practices in Swedish energy-intensive industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.011
Upham, D. P., Sovacool, P. B., & Ghosh, D. B. (2022). Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 167). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112699
Wei, Z., Xue, K., Hu, G., Wu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Decarbonizing Strategies of China’s Iron and Steelmaking Industry: A Comprehensive Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411268
Wu, H., Cheng, J., Zhong, H., & Jin, F. (2025). Recent progress in iron and steel industry decarbonization strategies: industrial advancements and challenges. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research (Vol. 32, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36038-7
Xu, C., Gao, Y., & Lv, M. (2025). Global greenhouse gas emissions in the 21st century: Complex network, driver pattern and economy-based interaction. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2025.05.002
Zhou, Y., Liu, Z., Kato, T., Shi, C., Xu, T., & Gao, W. (2024). Decoding the mechanisms influencing public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology in China. Energy, 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133888
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).











