Percepciones sociales frente a la descarbonización de sectores industriales en Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6075Palavras-chave:
descarbonización industrial, percepción ciudadana, políticas climáticas, aceptación social, sectores intensivos en emisionesResumo
La descarbonización de los sectores industriales intensivos en emisiones es un componente clave para alcanzar los compromisos climáticos, pero su viabilidad depende no solo de factores técnicos y económicos, sino también de la aceptación social. Este artículo analiza las percepciones ciudadanas frente a estrategias de descarbonización industrial en Ecuador, con énfasis en sectores de difícil mitigación. Se desarrolló un estudio exploratorio basado en encuestas aplicadas a 502 personas adultas (>18 años) residentes en el país, abordando dimensiones como conocimiento, aceptación pública, percepción de riesgos y beneficios, confianza institucional y disposición al cambio. Los resultados evidencian una alta conciencia sobre el cambio climático, contrastada con un bajo nivel de familiaridad con el concepto de descarbonización, lo que incrementa la indecisión frente al apoyo a políticas climáticas. Se observa un mayor respaldo a medidas percibidas como tangibles, como la expansión de energías renovables y la mejora del transporte público, mientras que los instrumentos fiscales presentan menor aceptación. La aceptación de tecnologías emergentes, como la captura, utilización y almacenamiento de carbono (CCUS), está fuertemente condicionada por la percepción de seguridad y el conocimiento previo. Asimismo, la confianza en universidades y científicos supera ampliamente a la confianza en el gobierno, influyendo de manera significativa en el apoyo ciudadano. El estudio concluye que la educación técnica, la equidad distributiva y la transparencia institucional son factores determinantes para fortalecer la legitimidad social de la descarbonización industrial en Ecuador.
Downloads
Referências
Abdelaziz, E. A., Saidur, R., & Mekhilef, S. (2011). A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 15, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.003
Al Mamun, A., Yang, M., Hayat, N., Gao, J., & Yang, Q. (2025). The nexus of environmental values, beliefs, norms and green consumption intention. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04979-6
Andrijevskaja, J., & Volkova, A. (2025). Industrial energy use, efficiency, and savings: methods for quantitative analysis. Energy Efficiency, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-025-10367-5
Bachorz, C., Verpoort, P. C., Luderer, G., & Ueckerdt, F. (2025). Exploring techno-economic landscapes of abatement options for hard-to-electrify sectors. Nature Communications , 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59277-1
Barbhuiya, S., Kanavaris, F., Das, B. B., & Idrees, M. (2024). Decarbonising cement and concrete production: Strategies, challenges and pathways for sustainable development. In Journal of Building Engineering (Vol. 86). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108861
Carvajal, R. (2021). Formación Profesional Para Desempleados / As Y Desarrollo Sostenible. Prisma Social-Jovenes y Nuevas Formas de Comunicacion y Marketing, 34.
Chung, C., Kim, J., Sovacool, B. K., Griffiths, S., Bazilian, M., & Yang, M. (2023). Decarbonizing the chemical industry: A systematic review of sociotechnical systems, technological innovations, and policy options. In Energy Research and Social Science (Vol. 96). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102955
Dabla-Norris, E. (2023). Public Support for Climate Change Mitigation Policies: A Cross Country Survey. IMF Working Papers, 2023(223). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400258138.001
Das, R. R., Sussman, R., & Carlson, R. (2025). Trust in scientists, researchers, and environmental organizations associated with policy support for energy transition. Energy and Climate Change, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100179
De la Rosa, D., Giménez, P., & De la Calle, C. (2019). Educación para el desarrollo sostenible: el papel de la universidad en la Agenda 2030. Revista Prisma Social, N°25.
Di Benedetto, A., Wieners, C. E., Dijkstra, H. A., & von der Heydt, A. S. (2025). Political processes affect the feasibility of climate policy in Integrated Assessment Models. Npj Climate Action, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00298-3
Domingues, B. C., Santos, D. M. F., Mateus, M., & Cecílio, D. (2024). Techno-Economic Analysis of Cement Decarbonization Techniques: Oxygen Enrichment vs. Hydrogen Fuel. Hydrogen (Switzerland), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5010005
Gerres, T., Chaves Ávila, J. P., Llamas, P. L., & San Román, T. G. (2019). A review of cross-sector decarbonisation potentials in the European energy intensive industry. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 210). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.036
Guduru, R. K., Tiwari, N., & Mali, J. (2025). Decarbonization technologies and strategies. In Decarbonizing the Petroleum Industry: Current Status, Ongoing Activities, and Future Prospects. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-31524-4.00003-4
Hasan, A. S. M. M., & Trianni, A. (2020). A review of energy management assessment models for industrial energy efficiency. In Energies (Vol. 13, Issue 21). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215713
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. In Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Johnson, O. W., Mete, G., Sanchez, F., Shawoo, Z., & Talebian, S. (2021). Toward climate‐neutral heavy industry: An analysis of industry transition roadmaps. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125375
Kaplan, P. O., Boyd, G., Browning, M., Perl, K., Supekar, S., Victor, N., & Worrell, E. (2025). Is the industrial sector hard to decarbonize or hard to model? A comparative analysis of industrial modeling and net zero carbon dioxide pathways. Energy and Climate Change, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100190
Kern, C., & Jess, A. (2021). Reducing Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Meet Climate Targets—A Comprehensive Quantification and Reasonable Options. Energies, 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175260
Kloo, Y., Nilsson, L. J., & Palm, E. (2024). Reaching net-zero in the chemical industry—A study of roadmaps for industrial decarbonisation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2023.100075
Kumar, A., Tiwari, A. K., & Milani, D. (2024). Decarbonizing hard-to-abate heavy industries: Current status and pathways towards net-zero future. In Process Safety and Environmental Protection (Vol. 187). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.107
Lai, H. L., Devine-Wright, P., Hamilton, J., Mander, S., Clery, D., Rattle, I., Martin, A., Ryder, S., & Taylor, P. (2025). A Place-based, Just Transition framework can guide industrial decarbonisation with a social licence. In Energy Research and Social Science (Vol. 121). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.103967
Leal Filho, W., Ben Hassen, T., Matandirotya, N., & Ng, A. (2025). Empty promises: Some requirements for a successful implementation of decarbonisation strategies in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179409
Li, Z., Sun, L., Zhang, R., & Hanaoka, T. (2024). Decarbonization pathways promote improvements in cement quality and reduce the environmental impact of China’s cement industry. Communications Earth and Environment, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01929-z
Lockwood, M., Herman, K., Iskandarova, M., Pultar, A., Ferrier, J., & Sovacool, B. (2025). Beyond industrial decarbonisation strategy: Lessons from the bottom-up policy mix in the United Kingdom, 2021–2023. Energy Research and Social Science, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104431
Löfgren, Å., Ahlvik, L., van den Bijgaart, I., Coria, J., Jaraitė, J., Johnsson, F., & Rootzén, J. (2024). Green industrial policy for climate action in the basic materials industry. Climatic Change, 177(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03801-7
Lu, X., Tian, W., Li, H., Li, X., Quan, K., & Bai, H. (2023). Decarbonization options of the iron and steelmaking industry based on a three-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-022-2475-7
Malehmirchegini, L., & Chapman, A. J. (2025). Strategies for achieving carbon neutrality within the chemical industry. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 217). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115762
Moffat, K., Lacey, J., Zhang, A., & Leipold, S. (2016). The social licence to operate: A critical review. In Forestry (Vol. 89, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv044
Pan, Q., Held, M., & Backmann, J. (2024). Technological and policy options for the defossilisation of chemical manufacturing. In RSC Sustainability (Vol. 3, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4su00601a
Plank, J. (2025). Decarbonization strategies for the global cement and concrete industry. Highlighting the role of chemical admixtures for successful transition. Revista Alconpat, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.21041/ra.v15i2.819
Rissman, J., Bataille, C., Masanet, E., Aden, N., Morrow, W. R., Zhou, N., Elliott, N., Dell, R., Heeren, N., Huckestein, B., Cresko, J., Miller, S. A., Roy, J., Fennell, P., Cremmins, B., Koch Blank, T., Hone, D., Williams, E. D., de la Rue du Can, S., … Helseth, J. (2020). Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. In Applied Energy (Vol. 266). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848
Rodríguez Diez, J., Tomé-Torquemada, S., Vicente, A., Reyes, J., & Orcajo, G. A. (2023). Decarbonization Pathways, Strategies, and Use Cases to Achieve Net-Zero CO2 Emissions in the Steelmaking Industry. Energies, 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217360
Schulze, M., Nehler, H., Ottosson, M., & Thollander, P. (2016). Energy management in industry - A systematic review of previous findings and an integrative conceptual framework. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 112). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.060
Seijo-Bestilleiro, E., Arias-Fernández, I., Carro-López, D., & Naveiro, M. (2025). Opportunities for Emission Reduction in the Transformation of Petroleum Refining. Fuels, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6030066
Shi, X., Wang, G., Wang, X., & Chen, B. (2024). A Study on the Promoting Role of Renewable Hydrogen in the Transformation of Petroleum Refining Pathways. Processes, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071317
Sovacool, B. K., AbdulRafiu, A., Hudson, M., McManus, M., Korre, A., Marr, I., Howard, C., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2024). Beyond the factory: Ten interdisciplinary lessons for industrial decarbonisation practice and policy. Energy Reports, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.048
Sovacool, B. K., Devine-Wright, P., Mander, S., Rowley, J., & Ryder, S. (2025). Realising a locally-embedded just transition: Sense of place, lived experience, and social perceptions of industrial decarbonisation in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103051
Sovacool, B. K., Iskandarova, M., & Geels, F. W. (2024). Leading the post-industrial revolution? Policy windows, issue linkage and decarbonization dynamics in the UK’s net-zero strategy (2010–2022). Industrial and Corporate Change, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtae015
Thollander, P., & Ottosson, M. (2010). Energy management practices in Swedish energy-intensive industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.011
Upham, D. P., Sovacool, P. B., & Ghosh, D. B. (2022). Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 167). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112699
Wei, Z., Xue, K., Hu, G., Wu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Decarbonizing Strategies of China’s Iron and Steelmaking Industry: A Comprehensive Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411268
Wu, H., Cheng, J., Zhong, H., & Jin, F. (2025). Recent progress in iron and steel industry decarbonization strategies: industrial advancements and challenges. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research (Vol. 32, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36038-7
Xu, C., Gao, Y., & Lv, M. (2025). Global greenhouse gas emissions in the 21st century: Complex network, driver pattern and economy-based interaction. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2025.05.002
Zhou, Y., Liu, Z., Kato, T., Shi, C., Xu, T., & Gao, W. (2024). Decoding the mechanisms influencing public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology in China. Energy, 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133888
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e cedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação e o direito de edição.

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os(As) autores(as) que publicam nesta Revista aceitam as seguintes condições:
- Os(As) autores(as) conservam os direitos autorais.
- Os(As) autores(as) cedem à Revista o direito da primeira publicação e os direitos de edição.
- Todo o conteúdo é regulado por uma Licença Atribuição/Reconhecimento-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional. Consulte a versão informativa e o texto legal. Isso permite que terceiros utilizem o publicado desde que mencionem a autoria e a primeira publicação nesta Revista. Se o material for transformado, o trabalho modificado não poderá ser distribuído.
- Os(As) autores(as) podem realizar outros acordos contratuais adicionais para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada (ex.: repositório institucional ou livro), desde que indiquem a publicação original nesta Revista.
- Recomenda-se que os(as) autores(as) publiquem seu trabalho na internet (páginas institucionais ou pessoais) após a publicação oficial, citando a Revista para aumentar a difusão (veja The Effect of Open Access).











