Vulnerability Commercialization in Digital Environments
An Empirical Study on Emotional Exposure, Social Validation, and Well-Being in Young College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65598/rps.6163Keywords:
Digital vulnerability, Social validation, Social comparison, Perceived stress, Social networksAbstract
In recent decades, the expansion of digital platforms has intensified the public visibility of emotional experiences, configuring an environment in which vulnerability is inscribed in dynamics of recognition and symbolic performance. This study analyzes the relationship between emotional exposure in social networks, digital validation, social comparison, and perceived stress in the Latin American university population. A sequential mixed design was adopted that combined content analysis of 500 public publications and a survey of 400 students. The results show that emotional exposure is positively associated with perceived stress, an effect partially mediated by social validation and interpersonal comparison. Likewise, content with greater emotional intensity presents higher levels of interaction, which suggests the existence of amplification logics in the digital ecosystem. It is concluded that digital vulnerability is a complex relational phenomenon, where recognition and discomfort can coexist.
Downloads
References
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Rutledge, S. A., Bunn, S., Paul, M., Dennen, V., & Park-Gaghan, T. (2025). Exploring teen well-being and social media use during the pandemic summer of 2020. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 30(1), 2447464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2024.2447464
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
El Ouadghiri, I., Kaabia, O., Peillex, J., Platania, F., & Hernandez, C. T. (2025). Attention to biodiversity and stock returns. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97, 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103855
Zhang, L. (2025). The digital age of religious communication: The shaping and challenges of religious beliefs through social media. Studies on Religion and Philosophy, 1(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.71204/de63mn10
Heitmayer, M. (2025). The second wave of attention economics. Attention as a universal symbolic currency on social media and beyond. Interacting with Computers, 37(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae035
Enli, G. (2025). Regulatory barriers in the attention economy: Lack of support, trust, and measures. Media, Culture & Society, 47(8), 1636-1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251350008
Fernández de la Iglesia, J. C., Casal Otero, L., Fernández Morante, M. C., & Cebreiro, B. (2020). Actitudes y uso de Internet y redes sociales en estudiantes universitarios/as de Galicia: implicaciones personales y sociales. Revista Prisma Social, (28), 145–160. Recuperado de https://revistaprismasocial.es/ps/article/view/3372
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
Han, B.-C. (2014). Psicopolítica: Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder. Herder.
Hearn, A. (2008). “Meat, mask, burden”: Probing the contours of the branded self. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508090086
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
Gross, T. (2025). Un-Help: Why Your Pain Is Profitable. An Epistemic Critique of the Self-Help Industry. PsyArXiv.
Illouz, E. (2009). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. Social Service Review. Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 138-141. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/599769
Illouz, E. (2009). Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Social Forces Journal. Volume 88, Number 2, pp. 977-978. Doi:10.1353/sof.0.0258
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., Shablack, H., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLOS ONE, 8(8), e69841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069841
Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Canadian Journal of Communication. Volume 40, Number 1. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2015v40n1a2885
Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J. (2013). Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceived social support. Journal of Health Communication, 18(9), 1079–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.757396
Pérez-Escolar, M., Alcaide-Pulido, P., & Del Toro, A. (2023). Nuevos referentes informativos de la generación Z: estudio del rol de los/as influencers en TikTok como divulgadores/as de contenidos. Revista Prisma Social, (40), 262–288. Recuperado de https://revistaprismasocial.es/ps/article/view/4863
Tarullo, R. (2020). ¿Por qué los y las jóvenes están en las redes sociales? Un análisis de sus motivaciones a partir de la teoría de usos y gratificaciones. Revista Prisma Social, (29), 222–239, recuperación en línea. Recuperado de https://revistaprismasocial.es/ps/article/view/3558
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 9(5), 584–590. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000047
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).
