The neighborhood as a seedbed of popular and community economy
The protagonism of 'the most disadvantaged' in the policies of Socio-Urban Integration in Argentina
Keywords:
state, popular economy, public policies, urbanism, poverty, work, conflictAbstract
This article aims to historicize the ongoing struggle process carried out by the Union of Popular Economy Workers concerning the demand for recognition of Popular Neighborhoods (settlements, slums, etc.). It represents a strategic effort that succeeded in institutionalizing itself within the Ministry of Social Development of the Nation through the creation and management of the Secretariat for Socio-Urban Integration, born and conceived within the productive units of popular economy and territorial organizations. This trajectory is interesting as an emblematic case of political, economic, and cultural innovation led by workers. Therefore, an analysis is proposed to assess its scope as an alternative economic experience and its relationship of co-construction, co-government, co-option, and/or tension with the State. To do so, a brief overview is provided of the state of the art of studies on Popular Economy in the Latin American region and its tensions with Social and Solidarity Economy. Subsequently, a study of documents and discursive records is carried out, focusing on: the semantic shifts from slums/settlements to popular neighborhoods, and from squatters/occupants to popular economy workers; the uses of urban space; and the institutional arrangements that were activated in the process, as dimensions of analysis.
Downloads
References
AA.VV. (2020). Plan de Desarrollo Humano Integral. Propuestas para la Argentina postpandemia. Disponible en: https://plandesarrollohumanointegral.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Plan-de-Desarrollo-Humano-Integral.CORREGIDO.pdf
Almeida, P. (2020). Movimientos sociales: la estructura de la acción colectiva. CLACSO.
Almeida, P. y Cordero Ulate, A. (Eds) (2017). Movimientos sociales en América Latina. Perspectivas, tendencias y casos. Colección Democracias en Movimiento. CLACSO.
Avalle, G. (2009). Clases y territorio: construcción de subjetividades en los movimientos sociales. Revista de Antropología Avá. 14, 69-84.
Avalle, G. (2010). Las luchas del trabajo: sentidos y acciones de docentes, meretrices y piqueteros en Córdoba. EDUCC.
Avalle, G. (2019). El procesamiento estatal de las demandas populares. El caso de Córdoba, Argentina. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 165, 29-44.
Avalle, G. (2020). Sindicatos y movimientos sociales. Una confluencia teórico metodológica desde Latinoamérica. Revista Sociología del Trabajo. 97, 71-83.
Boggs, C. (2014). Social Movements and Political Power: Emerging Forms of Radicalism in the West. Temple University Press. Published online by Cambridge University Press.
Canelo, P. y Castellani, A. (2016). Informe de investigación 1. Perfil sociológico de los miembros del gabinete inicial del presidente Mauricio Macri. Observatorio de las elites argentinas. IDAES-UNSAM.
Chihu Amparán, A. y López Gallegos, A. (2004). El análisis de los marcos en la obra de William Gamson. Estudios Sociológicos. 21(2), 435-460.
Coraggio, J. L. (2020). Economía social y popular: conceptos básicos. Contribuciones de Consejeres. Serie de Documentos. Argentina. Ministerio de Desarrollo Productivo. INAES.
Della Porta, D. y Diani, M. (2012). Los movimientos sociales. Editorial Complutense.
Eizaguirre, S. (2016). De la innovación social a la economía solidaria. Claves prácticas para el desarrollo de políticas públicas. CIRIEC-España. 88, 201-230.
Ferrero, M. M. (2018). Ciudad capitalista, gobierno y resistencias. Un estudio de casos múltiples de Asunción (Paraguay), Córdoba (Argentina) y La Paz (Bolivia). Tesis del doctorado en Estudios Sociales de América Latina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
Gaiger, L. I. (2004). A economia solidaria no Brasil e o sentido das novas formas de produçao nao capitalista. Cayapa. Revista Venezolana de Economía Social. 4(8), 9-34.
Griffing, B. (2018). The Power of Protest: A Visual History of the Moments That Changed the World. Sourcebooks.
INDEC (2023). Condiciones de vida vol.7 n° 4. Incidencia de la pobreza y la indigencia en 31 aglomerados urbanos. Segundo semestre de 2022. Disponible en https://www.indec.gob.ar/uploads/informesdeprensa/eph_pobreza_03_2302A7EBAFE4.pdf
Jiménez, J. (2016). Avances y desafíos de la economía social y solidaria en Ecuador. En C. Puig. (Ed). Economía Social y Solidaria: conceptos, prácticas y políticas públicas. 107-139. UPV/EHU.
Quijano, A. (2007). ¿Sistemas alternativos de producción?. En J. L. Coraggio (Ed) La economía social desde la periferia. Contribuciones latinoamericanas. 145-164. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, Altamira Editores.
Ricketts, A. (2012). The Activists' Handbook: A Step-by-Step Guide to Participative Democracy Get access Arrow. Zed Books.
Rodríguez, M. C. y Ciolli, V. (2011). Tensiones entre el emprendedorismo y la autogestión: el papel de las políticas públicas en este recorrido. Org & Demo. 12(1), 27-46.
Singer, P. (2002). Introdução à Economia Solidária. Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Singer, P. (2009). Relaciones entre sociedad y estado en la economía solidaria. Iconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 33. 51-65.
Strada, J. (2012). Debates al interior de la economía social: la reconfiguración neoliberal y la visión regeneradora de las políticas sociales. Papeles De Trabajo. Centro De Estudios Interdisciplinarios. Etnolingüística y Antropología Socio-Cultural. 24, 49–72. https://doi.org/10.35305/revista.v0i24.95
Vaillancourt, Y. (2011). La economía social en la co-producción y en la co-construcción de las políticas públicas. Revista del Centro de Estudios de Sociología del Trabajo. 3, 1-38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Prisma Social

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).











